Full leathers - leather jerkin should be allowed. We had "a suede jerkin" released as a DMC prize (3-slot fusion armor).

Just my 2 cents…

-E

The official documentation for weapons lists all the various names that weapons can go by. The documentation on armor does not have the same. Perhaps thats something that can be added to the armor documentation.

Chad, player of a few

+1

Further on that train of thought...
What about wizard robes? Is that allowed?
Wizard hat is literally in the alter documentation as allowed.
So let's assume for a moment that that wizard robes are allowed, what separates a magi from a wizard from a magister from a magus?

Well let's look at a dictionary... magi is the plural form of magus and magus is a magician/sorcerer or in other words a magic user.
Magician being defined as someone who makes the impossible happen, same with sorcerer which is someone who uses sorcery.
In the generic sense of the word, magi would mean magic-user, so therefore a magic-user's armor.

Sure, you can't discern healer leathers from from a bartender's leathers because honestly nobody knows what the hell healer's leathers look like.
But you could probably imagine when you say bartender leathers that it'd be stained with ale and shabby work leathers.

Similarly if I said magician's armor I assume you would be imagining some set of pristine set of armor with all sort of fancy intricate designs that do all sorts of complex magical impossible things.. well because.. it's magic.

The old "ranger's cloak" dilemma.

It's a matter of art. It's not something one can get argumentative about. It Is Decided that there are some styles, attributes and cultural aesthetics that are generally recognizable, and some that are not. You can figure out which by experience, and then kind of reason / feel it out from that.

-E

>What about wizard robes? Is that allowed?
>Wizard hat is literally in the alter documentation as allowed.

I think we all have a specific image for "a wizard hat." But, not a "sorcerer hat" for instance. This is a less typical case, where the profession adjective actually specifies something identifiable.

The 'wizard robes' are unlikely to be allowed, because I don't distinguish which robes a wizard wears from other kinds of robes. As yourself if "sorcerer robes" and "wizard robes" are different. I think the answer is no, and as such, this is disallowed.

---

>An officer of the Sorcerer Guild arrives and glances around. "Ah, there you are, Vathon!" he says in a slightly agitated tone. "I have come to formally declare that your membership privileges have been revoked."

And definitely pointed. Someone pass me a Funnelweb. . .

I have a vision of a sorcerer's hat, as well. A hemispherical collection of alternating red and white wedged shape sections, with a modest free-spinning wooden propeller raised three-fingers width at the cap's peak.

Doug