Its true.

:oP Ragran

My question is..when a theif steals from us..how do we know exactly how much hes stolen? and if he gives us coin back, how do we know thats exactly how much hes stolen?

How does that exactly work? I'm sorry, doesn't seem if the coins are returned, that consent should be nulled.

1) If someone even tries to steal from me, and misses, I still have consent on them for the attempt.
2) I can even accuse someone who steals from me and doesn't get in.


So.. clarification.

I'm a trader and I"m walking around doing my routes.
I catch a thief with his hand in my pockets
The thief, without a word, gives me 2 gold and runs off

Now... I have no avenues of reciprocation here? It seems to me you still have consent or thugs or whatever, just for the attempt.

I could see if you asked for the coins back, and the thief gives them. But it doesn't seem like they should be able to cover their backs just by giving coins and running off.


-Wighten

<<Adera>>
That was cool, and rare, that you tried to help clarify.

<<Also...the ACT of stealing, theivery, is still committed.>>

I know when you say the ACT OF STEALING yer referring to someone using the steal verb then getting caught. I wanted to add that if someone plays a mugger that rarely employs stealth to steal (like me) there is an argument for consent even if I dont get caught.

For example: Ragran smiles mockingly at Wighten and says, "Turn out ya pockets, ya stupid cow!"

That's sorta consentual. Its moot because noone else plays like this...but they should!

:oP Ragran