Glemm is back.
Korsik is a Paladin.
Bunch of nancies.
Oh, hi. I'm back. ;)
PRAXIS
WOODHAMR3
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/22/2009 07:00 PM CDT
Did you bring Kolaisa with you, good sir?
btw, smite is dead, haven't you heard
-Mr. Glemm
btw, smite is dead, haven't you heard
-Mr. Glemm
NEELD
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/22/2009 07:03 PM CDT
Ok, we have now come full circle with Kola coming back.
Madigan
"le rage du paladine" Korsik
Madigan
"le rage du paladine" Korsik
PRAXIS
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/22/2009 07:04 PM CDT
Nah. Haven't seen/heard Kola in years.
>btw, smite is dead, haven't you heard
Hrm. There are apparently many things I haven't heard. Do tell. And knock off that 'sir' crap. Sounds fruity.
>btw, smite is dead, haven't you heard
Hrm. There are apparently many things I haven't heard. Do tell. And knock off that 'sir' crap. Sounds fruity.
WOODHAMR3
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/22/2009 07:13 PM CDT
<<And knock off that 'sir' crap. Sounds fruity.>>
:_(
I'll let you find out naturally, my good man.
-Mr. Glemm
:_(
I'll let you find out naturally, my good man.
-Mr. Glemm
PRAXIS
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/22/2009 07:35 PM CDT
Hey Mads. I'm not Kola, but I did play as Kola the day I lured him into the hatch on the Seerah during low tide and he had to go to his RL sister's wedding.
TELGER
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/22/2009 11:04 PM CDT
An OG Paladin...welcome back Slaris.
~Thilan
~Thilan
RAB1DW0MBAT
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/23/2009 01:29 AM CDT
>>Korsik is a Paladin.
You should be damn happy to be able to say that truthfully.
- Chivalrous Shield Korsik Rippentropp, Most Noble Paladine
Crusader against the Innocent
Defender of All That is Wrong
You should be damn happy to be able to say that truthfully.
- Chivalrous Shield Korsik Rippentropp, Most Noble Paladine
Crusader against the Innocent
Defender of All That is Wrong
PRAXIS
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/23/2009 05:12 PM CDT
>An OG Paladin...welcome back Slaris.
Thanks, Thilan.
Not Slaris anymore. Unfortunately, I walked Slaris 2 years or so ago. I'm sure you'll all be thrilled to know I've rolled a new Paladii.
Son of Slaris. Heh.
Thanks, Thilan.
Not Slaris anymore. Unfortunately, I walked Slaris 2 years or so ago. I'm sure you'll all be thrilled to know I've rolled a new Paladii.
Son of Slaris. Heh.
WOODHAMR3
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/23/2009 05:16 PM CDT
LAME
btw they do character restores, I think it's like 300 bucks.
-Mr. Glemm
btw they do character restores, I think it's like 300 bucks.
-Mr. Glemm
PRAXIS
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/23/2009 05:20 PM CDT
>You should be damn happy to be able to say that truthfully.
I look forward to the carnage.
I look forward to the carnage.
PRAXIS
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/23/2009 05:22 PM CDT
I won't be needing a restore.
Lame or not, it's a bit too late to worry about it.
Lame or not, it's a bit too late to worry about it.
WOODHAMR3
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/23/2009 05:22 PM CDT
Whatever.
Just don't train HX like before. Go LX. I'm sure you're the last person I need to give training tips to.. but just sayin.
-Mr. Glemm
Just don't train HX like before. Go LX. I'm sure you're the last person I need to give training tips to.. but just sayin.
-Mr. Glemm
JULIAN
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/23/2009 05:29 PM CDT
Were you Kolaisa or Slaris? I can't remember.
- Mazrian
The Flying Company
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d194/huldahspal/flyingcompany.png
- Mazrian
The Flying Company
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d194/huldahspal/flyingcompany.png
DWARB-POWER
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/23/2009 05:32 PM CDT
wb
- Simon
You're about to get boxed!
http://media.photobucket.com/image/monkey%20punch/cabosstone/Monkeypunch.jpg
- Simon
You're about to get boxed!
http://media.photobucket.com/image/monkey%20punch/cabosstone/Monkeypunch.jpg
DR-LYNEYA
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/23/2009 05:39 PM CDT
Welcome back, Slaris who isn't Slaris anymore!
Thanks!
Lyneya
Thanks!
Lyneya
WOODHAMR3
PONCHI
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/24/2009 02:40 AM CDT
I didn't even know we still had this folder anymore. Welcome back.
Leucius
Never argue with an idiot, they bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Leucius
Never argue with an idiot, they bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
PRAXIS
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/24/2009 07:36 AM CDT
>I didn't even know we still had this folder anymore. Welcome back.
Thanks Leucros. :D
Thanks Leucros. :D
PRAXIS
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/24/2009 08:18 AM CDT
>Just don't train HX like before. Go LX.
Why not HX with arm-worn shields? IIRC the shield penalty (vs full effect) was not that terrible since shield is likely to be higher anyways.
I haven't gotten a ranged yet, cuz I'm broke.
Why not HX with arm-worn shields? IIRC the shield penalty (vs full effect) was not that terrible since shield is likely to be higher anyways.
I haven't gotten a ranged yet, cuz I'm broke.
TELGER
Re: This folder is pathetic
10/24/2009 02:17 PM CDT
>>Why not HX with arm-worn shields? IIRC the shield penalty (vs full effect) was not that terrible since shield is likely to be higher anyways.
One of the planned changes they're going to make is using any two-handed weapon with an armworn shield is going to suffer penalties to both the weapon and shield.
http://www.play.net/forums/messages.asp?forum=20&category=11&topic=1&message=163
- Here is the catch. Arm-worn shields will also apply a hindrance penalty to both the shield and the weapon when used in conjunction with two-handed weapons (with a few possible exceptions). This is being done to offset the many advantages shield has compared to the other two active defenses. Shield use will work best overall with one-handed weapons. While using two-handed weapons while wearing shields will still be perfectly possible, it will come at a cost to effectiveness for both the shield and the weapon. Again, this hindrance can be reduced with training.
- The use of two-handed missiles will likewise be hindered, and will probably have additional restrictions similar to the current ones for bows and arm-worn shields.
- It is very likely (but not completely certain at this stage) that some exceptions to the above will be made for pole arms to give these weapons a bit of a perk. In addition, because they only require one hand, thrown weapons, slings, and light crossbows will be far more viable with shields than bows and heavy crossbows.
~Thilan
One of the planned changes they're going to make is using any two-handed weapon with an armworn shield is going to suffer penalties to both the weapon and shield.
http://www.play.net/forums/messages.asp?forum=20&category=11&topic=1&message=163
- Here is the catch. Arm-worn shields will also apply a hindrance penalty to both the shield and the weapon when used in conjunction with two-handed weapons (with a few possible exceptions). This is being done to offset the many advantages shield has compared to the other two active defenses. Shield use will work best overall with one-handed weapons. While using two-handed weapons while wearing shields will still be perfectly possible, it will come at a cost to effectiveness for both the shield and the weapon. Again, this hindrance can be reduced with training.
- The use of two-handed missiles will likewise be hindered, and will probably have additional restrictions similar to the current ones for bows and arm-worn shields.
- It is very likely (but not completely certain at this stage) that some exceptions to the above will be made for pole arms to give these weapons a bit of a perk. In addition, because they only require one hand, thrown weapons, slings, and light crossbows will be far more viable with shields than bows and heavy crossbows.
~Thilan