Prev_page Previous 1 2 Next Next_page
Re: My outing, without my name! 09/07/2015 07:56 PM CDT
>> There would be burial mounds, mass graves everywhere you went.

I'm not sure it's common knowledge that a good 1/3 of the population of mainland Kermoria died in the Lyras War.

It should be, but it's hard to get info like that out there.



Thayet
Twitter: @thayelf
Tumblr: thayette.tumblr.com
Reply
Re: My outing, without my name! 09/07/2015 08:07 PM CDT

>It's "doing necromancy" in the sense that you are casting a spell that is defined as necromancy. (What Necromancers see as arcane mana isn't really a distinct type of mana. It's a perceptual distortion that results from their flawed method of attuning to three frequencies of mana at once.)

Right, it's 'doing necromancy' insofar as it's casting a spell that is associated with Arcane patterns. But we all know, irrespective of our cosmic leanings, that any sort of mana can maybe kind of mostly be used to power spell patterns. Thus, a Warmie casting Obfuscation isn't any more 'doing necromancy' than a Cleric casting Vigor is 'doing Empathy', or to use a better example because Empathy is a specific skill as well as a guild, or a Cleric casting Instinct is 'doing Ranger-y'.

My point is that mechanically we the players understand that people who PERC with Obfuscation up are probably Necromancers because they cast a spell that Necromancers cast, but (IIRC) aside from Clerics, and maybe Paladins/Empaths, casting Arcane spells that aren't signature doesn't have any negative consequences, because it's not an example of 'doing necromancy'.

I suppose the distinctions are somewhat fine here, or maybe I'm misunderstanding something.
Reply
Re: My outing, without my name! 09/07/2015 08:15 PM CDT


I'm aware of that!

I just don't think someone who scarcely left the Temple, never ventured outside Crossing, and was born after things had had several years to settle down would automatically have to know everything about the conflict and/or its perpetrator and/or the somewhat related Necromancer Guild.
Reply
Re: My outing, without my name! 09/07/2015 08:16 PM CDT


I was replying to the '1/3 of people got deaded' thing, for clarification.
Reply
Re: My outing, without my name! 09/07/2015 08:20 PM CDT


<<casting Arcane spells that aren't signature doesn't have any negative consequences, because it's not an example of 'doing necromancy'.>>

I don't think that's how sorcery works. My recollection was that Necromancy expressly requires manipulation of multiple mana types to function. Since non-necromancers can only be attuned to a single mana type, the sorcery is grasping blindly for at least a portion of their mana, operating on instinct and intuition. Some of that is probably paraphrased from a post by Armifer, and I may be misremembering, but I don't feel like looking it up right this moment XD
Reply
Re: My outing, without my name! 09/07/2015 08:52 PM CDT
>>Jhaliascleric: Right, it's 'doing necromancy' insofar as it's casting a spell that is associated with Arcane patterns. But we all know, irrespective of our cosmic leanings, that any sort of mana can maybe kind of mostly be used to power spell patterns. Thus, a Warmie casting Obfuscation isn't any more 'doing necromancy' than a Cleric casting Vigor is 'doing Empathy', or to use a better example because Empathy is a specific skill as well as a guild, or a Cleric casting Instinct is 'doing Ranger-y'.

All Necromancer spells are defined as necromancy, regardless of whether they are signature. Therefore, when you are casting those spells, it makes sense to say that you are using necromancy (in the little-n sense), even though you do not belong to the Necromancers' Guild and are not doing stereotypical necromantic things like creating undead beings.

Casting Necromancer spells isn't a simple case of sorcerous casting, such as when an Warrior Mage casts Vigor (a life spell). Necromancy is actual sorcery (what we used to call capital-S Sorcery), designed to be powered by a mixture of two or more types of mana. When you, as a Warrior Mage, cast Obfuscation, you are not simply using your native elemental mana in an "arcane pattern." You are working with that unstable mixture of life mana + something else that we call necromancy.

Granted, there have been inconsistences in the lore of sorcerous casting. When a Warrior Mage casts Vigor, is he blindly manipulating life mana, or is he simply forcing his native elemental mana to power a spell that was not designed for it? (I am reasonably sure that it's the former, but there have been conflicting posts.)



Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall rank!

Vote for DragonRealms on Top MUD Sites: http://www.topmudsites.com/vote-DragonRealms.html
Reply
Re: My outing, without my name! 09/07/2015 08:59 PM CDT


From my reading on Elanthipedia:

"The danger of this is that even when not attempting to do so, any attempt by a magic user to manipulate mana will either wholly or partially include their native mana as an unavoidable reflexive action. Without even intending to, the Cleric would end up funneling at least a small amount of holy mana into the Clear Vision spell, which it is not designed to handle, and occasionally result in catastrophic results."

Dunno if that's the current design or not.
Reply
Re: My outing, without my name! 09/07/2015 09:01 PM CDT
<<"The danger of this is that even when not attempting to do so, any attempt by a magic user to manipulate mana will either wholly or partially include their native mana as an unavoidable reflexive action. Without even intending to, the Cleric would end up funneling at least a small amount of holy mana into the Clear Vision spell, which it is not designed to handle, and occasionally result in catastrophic results."

That is the current design, yes.



Elanthipedia - https://elanthipedia.play.net/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page
Epedia Admins - https://elanthipedia.play.net/mediawiki/index.php/Elanthipedia:Administrators
Reply
Re: My outing, without my name! 09/07/2015 09:03 PM CDT
Moot point, because Obfuscation is necromancy. It's a necromantic spell pattern. A person casting Obfuscation is doing necromancy in the same way a person casting Vigil is doing holy magic. And as far as laymen are concerned, doing necromancy == being a Necromancer, even if that isn't necessarily true.



Thayet
Twitter: @thayelf
Tumblr: thayette.tumblr.com
Reply
Re: My outing, without my name! 09/07/2015 09:14 PM CDT
>>Necromancy, also known as "High Necromancy" or, by some scholars, as "Ontologic Sorcery", is the corruption of life itself. It often involves the creation of false life or pervasion of living things into unnatural forms. It is based on the mixture of Life Mana with either Elemenal or Lunar mana. This sorcery requires knowledge of the blasphemy known as Thanatology and is not a single spell book but instead contains the entire spectrum of spells used by the Necromancer guild. Unlike all other types of Sorcery, this magic does not contest the Sorcery Skill as long as it is used by a necromancer.

>>[[Lay Necromancy]] lacks the philosophical and theoretical complexity of the High Sorceries and can, therefore, be cast by anyone who has attunement
Lay Necromancy is the combination of Life magic with Lunar or Elemental Magic.

Those are the definitions on the wiki which were taken from an Armifer post on the types of sorcery. I.e. all Necromancer spells are by definition necromancy but are divided along signature/non-signature lines into High Necromancy and Lay Necromancy.



Elanthipedia - https://elanthipedia.play.net/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page
Epedia Admins - https://elanthipedia.play.net/mediawiki/index.php/Elanthipedia:Administrators
Reply
Re: My outing, without my name! 09/07/2015 09:16 PM CDT
And yes, the common person isn't very likely to be able to tell the difference, nor really care one way or the other except to scream "Necromancer!" and run away.



Elanthipedia - https://elanthipedia.play.net/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page
Epedia Admins - https://elanthipedia.play.net/mediawiki/index.php/Elanthipedia:Administrators
Reply
Re: My outing, without my name! 09/07/2015 10:41 PM CDT


Ah, ok, my understanding of the distinctions of necromancy for spellcasting was wrong. Thanks for the clarification!
Reply
Prev_page Previous 1 2 Next Next_page