Stealth:   1750 00.00% clear          (0/34)

Rank gain completely shuts off at 1750 and is no longer teachable. Can we get the rank cap increased?

This is unacceptable...... If dr has an end.... it really is THE END.

1 down, 52 to go.

1750 ranks in prime is quite an accomplishment, you should be very proud.

It would be great if some fraction of the overflow bits were redirected into the skill set bonus pool.

-Artificer Nilassa

You notice Kssarh trying to remain hidden while speaking.
You hear the voice of Kssarh say, "Slackers."

I don't understand. Why would you want the hard cap raised? It's already far, far too high as is, imo.

Now, this is just supposition, so take it with a grain of salt ... but it seems some people just like to make the numbers go up. Others play for immersion (hard to find a world as immersive as Elanthia.) It is my own humble opinion that the two playstyles are, more often than not, at odds. The larger the gap between a novice and a master (or whatever you want to call max rank) the more immersion breaking the skill system becomes. Unless of course you make the ranks worth less and less as the gap widens, I suppose.

I dunno about anyone else, but I don't really want to spend the next 5+ years making numbers go up, personally.

Would you rather I started my own thread to address the original post here? I fail to understand the problem. The original post is still relevant. I wasn't around 7 months ago, yet I'd still like to say my piece. Adding a new thread about it would just clutter things up.

I don't understand your issue.

Without conflicting, I'll explain: you're replying to something which has, in general, long since fled the general consciousness of the boards. You did this without including any relevant context which is long gone. If you had copied something to reply to, and framed your response around that, it wouldn't have mattered.

But as is, users will have to click back and search for the topic you're replying to and attempt to familiarize themselves with it again, to understand at all what your post is. Generally speaking it IS better to simy start a new thread than necro an old one, even if you just say 'I was reading and wanted to revive this' and introduce the topic again.

---

I'm a badger, I be badgerin'

>So then we'd have to swap back and forth between two threads... yeah that's brilliant Krooner, go back to your hole now.

Why would you swap back and forth between two threads if he simply made a new one? I know you apparently thought you could deliver some trolling, but at least make sense first. Common sense says 'make a new post with the relevant details of what you are discussing included'. YOU didn't do that.

---

I'm a badger, I be badgerin'